|
|
False Dawn: The Delusions of Global Capitalism
by John Gray
|
List Price: £8.99
Our Price: £3.74
Your Save: £ 0.00 ( % )
Availability: Usually dispatched within 24 hours
Manufacturer: Granta Books
|
Average Customer Rating:  
|
|
Binding: Paperback
Dewey Decimal Number: 320
EAN: 9781862075306
ISBN: 1862075301
Label: Granta Books
Number Of Pages: 272
Publication Date: 2002-08-08
Publisher: Granta Books
Studio: Granta Books
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spotlight customer reviews:
|
Customer Rating:
Summary: Global Capitalism Polemic
Comment: John Gray argues global capitalism is an unworkable, unattainable, unrealizable economic delusion. There are several reasons for this. Among them:
1. A free market is antithetical to democracy. A democracy where everyone has a say will never want a fully fledged free market because the losers will always outnumber the winners.
2. People will never be happy in a free market because the stress in their lifes will be too high as a result from the uncertainties of the free market.
3. The free market neglects human needs for social identity and social security. This means people will have no sense of loyality to state or political edifices. Lassez faire economics can only inevitably self implode.
In his polemic, he considers several economies including USA, New Zealand, Sweden, Germany, China and Japan. It's not a bad book but I think the shortcoming of it is that it is too concerned with nit picking
all the problems with the free market. While there's nothing wrong with a detailed analysis, it just seems one eyed. Nothing is ever perfect, so it should come as no suprise to any rational thinking person that the free market has its faults. The question is what is the best way for us to have innovation, efficiency and a humane welfare state with distribution of wealth? Is that possible or is it always a see-saw act between capitalist and socialist ideologies? I thought this book was too concerned with articulating problems rather than searching for solutions.
Customer Rating:
Summary: Capitalisms
Comment: Two writers who interest me because of the quality of their writings and the arguments which they put forward are Michael Prowse and John Gray. Both of these men have at one time been associated with what is known as the New Right, a term generally taken to mean, a heterogenous group of academics, intellectuals, scholars, journalists and sundry others who contributed to the resurgence of classical liberal, whig and similar ideas associated with Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan. Both of these authors have since turned away from those ideas and developed their thinking in other directions.
When I began to read this book I was reminded on Hayek's reason for not reviewing Keynes' General Theory: that he did not need to do so as he believed that Keynes would once again change his mind. However, as I proceeded to immerse myself in the material I began to gain some insight into the direction that Gray has gone.
I am sure that there are many who would simply dismiss these ideas as not worthy of serious consideration given that Gray is considered a turncoat in some quarters, and there are some who would merely denounce them from a simplistic neo-liberal point of view but I believe that such attitudes are seriously misguided. As Peter Wynarczyk once pointed out to me, we must all put our theories in the public domain so that they may be tested against competing theories. We can build walls against attack but then what use is a theory which is merely conditional. Gray recognises that many who swear allegiance to the neo-liberal doctrines have not fully thought through the implications of those theories and similarly also recognises the political ramifications of those policies when implemented by politicians and others.
After reading this book I am not coninced that Gray himself is anti-market. He seems to articulate a view of markets which are set within a social context, indeed he postulates competing capitalisms which to my mind is fully compatible within a classical liberal framework.
The target of his attack appears to be what he views as a programme, a political programme, of a world order based on a contemporary American conception of what a free market ought to be. Whereas Gray argues that the emergence of the phenomenon of globalisation is driven by the spread of new technologies as opposed to the breaking down of barriers against open or laissez faire economics, he develops the notion of a particular type of capitalism hell bent on world domination. False Dawn assesses the damage to other capitalisms and the implications thereof, and foresees a time when the general applicability of American capitalism will ultimately lead to it's demise and at a great cost. He believes that this juggernaut cannot be stopped easily due to the damage done to the power of the state through the past twenty or so years of it's extension to the global economy.
False Dawn also places this attempt to global economic domination within a context of the grand ideas of the Enlightenment and argues that as such it is doomed to failure. Gray writes comprehensively, providing examples from different capitalisms to support his theory and cleverly finds common results which support his findings. I found myself in disagreement with the notion that technology is an impetus for globalisation as I believe that the development and spread of technology is the result of an economic process rather than an instigator. Neither was I convinced of the fatality of his work. Even were I convinced of the disasterous consequences of the spread of one particular type of capitalism, I believe that the market process, through the creation of competitive forces will cause other capitalisms to fight for domination. Gray quotes Schumpeter's view on the nature of laissez faire in destroying and rebuilding to mourn the changes within societies but this is a double edged sword. Who is to say what was swept away is not worse than what is built?
Overall I think that this work is excellent and that it deserves serious attention rather than casual dismissal. False Dawn has some important arguements which policy makers, academics and intellectuals would do well to consider. The strength of ideas lies in their capacity to deal with attacks because it is only through those attacks that weakenesses, if not fatal flaws, can be detected. If we are confident in our belief in those ideas we should welcome attacks like Gray's for in the end we will find improvement.
Customer Rating:
Summary: The A to Z of Globalization
Comment: For anyone wishing to understand Globalization from scratch
False Dawn is ,in my view ,an essential choice on this subject.
John Gray explains that Globalization is the spread of technology across the world. However, whilst this causes interconnection ,it does not cause the convergence of societies into a homogenous ideal. Free market ideology conflicts with religion and ethnic differences. John Gray believes that societies should not be forced to participate in modernization. False Dawn is a magnificent book written by a huge Intellectual. John Gray has a way of writing that is lucid and can appeal to the lay person as well as the academic reader.
Customer Rating:
Summary: yet again
Comment: " the free market is a short loved phenonemon" Sorry, I thought it had been here since time immemorial. Quite simply it has. Ever since one cave man sold another cave man his dinosaur for the best price
It is statements like that that make you despair of left leaning "economists" because quite frankly, like a lot of this book, the views are simply not in touch with everyday reality
My personal views are slightly left of centre but even though we might all have misgivings about certain aspects of the free market and "globalisation", I find it difficult to feel to unhappy with what we have when we see the general prosperity ofthe countries that have adherred, to varying extents, to this creed. Gray also seems to feel that democracy and free market do not work together. He should get out more often...
Like too many of these slightly sneering books, no realistic alternatives are ever put forward. With this being the case, there is little point in reading further
For my money, left of centre economics are best explained by Paul Krugman. Read that, not this
Customer Rating:
Summary: yet again
Comment: " the free market is a short loved phenonemon" Sorry, I thought it had been here since time immemorial. Quite simply it has. Ever since one cave man sold another cave man his dinosaur for the best price
It is statements like that that make you despair of left leaning "economists" because quite frankly, like a lot of this book, the views are simply not in touch with everyday reality
My personal views are slightly left of centre but even though we might all have misgivings about certain aspects of the free market and "globalisation", I find it difficult to feel to unhappy with what we have when we see the general prosperity ofthe countries that have adherred, to varying extents, to this creed. Gray also seems to feel that democracy and free market do not work together. He should get out more often...
Like too many of these slightly sneering books, no realistic alternatives are ever put forward. With this being the case, there is little point in reading further
|
|
|
Editorial Reviews:
|
Customer Rating:
Summary: Global Capitalism Polemic
Comment: John Gray argues global capitalism is an unworkable, unattainable, unrealizable economic delusion. There are several reasons for this. Among them:
1. A free market is antithetical to democracy. A democracy where everyone has a say will never want a fully fledged free market because the losers will always outnumber the winners.
2. People will never be happy in a free market because the stress in their lifes will be too high as a result from the uncertainties of the free market.
3. The free market neglects human needs for social identity and social security. This means people will have no sense of loyality to state or political edifices. Lassez faire economics can only inevitably self implode.
In his polemic, he considers several economies including USA, New Zealand, Sweden, Germany, China and Japan. It's not a bad book but I think the shortcoming of it is that it is too concerned with nit picking
all the problems with the free market. While there's nothing wrong with a detailed analysis, it just seems one eyed. Nothing is ever perfect, so it should come as no suprise to any rational thinking person that the free market has its faults. The question is what is the best way for us to have innovation, efficiency and a humane welfare state with distribution of wealth? Is that possible or is it always a see-saw act between capitalist and socialist ideologies? I thought this book was too concerned with articulating problems rather than searching for solutions.
Customer Rating:
Summary: Capitalisms
Comment: Two writers who interest me because of the quality of their writings and the arguments which they put forward are Michael Prowse and John Gray. Both of these men have at one time been associated with what is known as the New Right, a term generally taken to mean, a heterogenous group of academics, intellectuals, scholars, journalists and sundry others who contributed to the resurgence of classical liberal, whig and similar ideas associated with Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan. Both of these authors have since turned away from those ideas and developed their thinking in other directions.
When I began to read this book I was reminded on Hayek's reason for not reviewing Keynes' General Theory: that he did not need to do so as he believed that Keynes would once again change his mind. However, as I proceeded to immerse myself in the material I began to gain some insight into the direction that Gray has gone.
I am sure that there are many who would simply dismiss these ideas as not worthy of serious consideration given that Gray is considered a turncoat in some quarters, and there are some who would merely denounce them from a simplistic neo-liberal point of view but I believe that such attitudes are seriously misguided. As Peter Wynarczyk once pointed out to me, we must all put our theories in the public domain so that they may be tested against competing theories. We can build walls against attack but then what use is a theory which is merely conditional. Gray recognises that many who swear allegiance to the neo-liberal doctrines have not fully thought through the implications of those theories and similarly also recognises the political ramifications of those policies when implemented by politicians and others.
After reading this book I am not coninced that Gray himself is anti-market. He seems to articulate a view of markets which are set within a social context, indeed he postulates competing capitalisms which to my mind is fully compatible within a classical liberal framework.
The target of his attack appears to be what he views as a programme, a political programme, of a world order based on a contemporary American conception of what a free market ought to be. Whereas Gray argues that the emergence of the phenomenon of globalisation is driven by the spread of new technologies as opposed to the breaking down of barriers against open or laissez faire economics, he develops the notion of a particular type of capitalism hell bent on world domination. False Dawn assesses the damage to other capitalisms and the implications thereof, and foresees a time when the general applicability of American capitalism will ultimately lead to it's demise and at a great cost. He believes that this juggernaut cannot be stopped easily due to the damage done to the power of the state through the past twenty or so years of it's extension to the global economy.
False Dawn also places this attempt to global economic domination within a context of the grand ideas of the Enlightenment and argues that as such it is doomed to failure. Gray writes comprehensively, providing examples from different capitalisms to support his theory and cleverly finds common results which support his findings. I found myself in disagreement with the notion that technology is an impetus for globalisation as I believe that the development and spread of technology is the result of an economic process rather than an instigator. Neither was I convinced of the fatality of his work. Even were I convinced of the disasterous consequences of the spread of one particular type of capitalism, I believe that the market process, through the creation of competitive forces will cause other capitalisms to fight for domination. Gray quotes Schumpeter's view on the nature of laissez faire in destroying and rebuilding to mourn the changes within societies but this is a double edged sword. Who is to say what was swept away is not worse than what is built?
Overall I think that this work is excellent and that it deserves serious attention rather than casual dismissal. False Dawn has some important arguements which policy makers, academics and intellectuals would do well to consider. The strength of ideas lies in their capacity to deal with attacks because it is only through those attacks that weakenesses, if not fatal flaws, can be detected. If we are confident in our belief in those ideas we should welcome attacks like Gray's for in the end we will find improvement.
Customer Rating:
Summary: The A to Z of Globalization
Comment: For anyone wishing to understand Globalization from scratch
False Dawn is ,in my view ,an essential choice on this subject.
John Gray explains that Globalization is the spread of technology across the world. However, whilst this causes interconnection ,it does not cause the convergence of societies into a homogenous ideal. Free market ideology conflicts with religion and ethnic differences. John Gray believes that societies should not be forced to participate in modernization. False Dawn is a magnificent book written by a huge Intellectual. John Gray has a way of writing that is lucid and can appeal to the lay person as well as the academic reader.
Customer Rating:
Summary: yet again
Comment: " the free market is a short loved phenonemon" Sorry, I thought it had been here since time immemorial. Quite simply it has. Ever since one cave man sold another cave man his dinosaur for the best price
It is statements like that that make you despair of left leaning "economists" because quite frankly, like a lot of this book, the views are simply not in touch with everyday reality
My personal views are slightly left of centre but even though we might all have misgivings about certain aspects of the free market and "globalisation", I find it difficult to feel to unhappy with what we have when we see the general prosperity ofthe countries that have adherred, to varying extents, to this creed. Gray also seems to feel that democracy and free market do not work together. He should get out more often...
Like too many of these slightly sneering books, no realistic alternatives are ever put forward. With this being the case, there is little point in reading further
For my money, left of centre economics are best explained by Paul Krugman. Read that, not this
Customer Rating:
Summary: yet again
Comment: " the free market is a short loved phenonemon" Sorry, I thought it had been here since time immemorial. Quite simply it has. Ever since one cave man sold another cave man his dinosaur for the best price
It is statements like that that make you despair of left leaning "economists" because quite frankly, like a lot of this book, the views are simply not in touch with everyday reality
My personal views are slightly left of centre but even though we might all have misgivings about certain aspects of the free market and "globalisation", I find it difficult to feel to unhappy with what we have when we see the general prosperity ofthe countries that have adherred, to varying extents, to this creed. Gray also seems to feel that democracy and free market do not work together. He should get out more often...
Like too many of these slightly sneering books, no realistic alternatives are ever put forward. With this being the case, there is little point in reading further
Back in the 1980s, capitalism seemed ready to finally inherit the earth. According to the likes of Francis Fukuyama, in his infamous book The End of History, history was coming to an end with the triumph of western capitalism, witnessed by the dramatic collapse of the Soviet Bloc and the growth of the global free market. Subsequent events, from the downfall of Mrs Thatcher to the recent financial unrest in Southeast Asia, have seriously questioned the validity of Fukuyama's arguments (not to mention other luminaries of the New Right). However, John Gray's wonderful False Dawn is the first book to convincingly dismantle the economic and historical presumptions of the 1980s, as we head into political and financial uncharted water. Writing with great economy and accessibility, Gray's argument is concise but portentous: the unfettered global free market economy will not spawn a self-regulating utopia, but increasing social instability and economic anarchy. With an impressive breadth of economic and social history, False Dawn convincingly argues that "the free market is a rare, short-lived phenomenon", a specific product of English nineteenth-century social engineering, from whose cycles of boom and bust we still have much to learn. Even more provocatively, Gray argues that "democracy and the free market are competitors rather than partners." The failures of the free market, from pre-war Europe to the collapse of the Mexican economy in 1994, have persistently shown that democratic state intervention is required to place checks and balances upon the erratic cycles of boom and bust which has characterised the relatively short history of the free market. Arguing with great passion and conviction, Gray explores the emergence of the belief in the global free market, via the increasingly discredited philosophy of the European Enlightenment, through the rise and fall of the free market in England from Palmerston to Thatcher. The book then analyses the potentially catastrophic investment in the free market coming out of the USA, the recent "Anarcho-capitalism" of post-communist Russia, and the crisis in the markets of Southeast Asia. Avoiding calls for a return to socialist planning, False Dawn is a refreshing and challenging polemic. Nevertheless, it offers few solutions to what Gray sees as "the deepening international anarchy" as free markets spiral out of control. While False Dawn may expose the shortcomings of contemporary global capitalism, it remains to be seen whether or not its arguments provoke more concrete solutions to the chronic instability of the free market. --Jerry Brotton
|
|
|
|
|
|
| eFinancialDistrict Market Place |
| CreditReporting.com | The FTC advises monitoring your CREDIT REPORT activity ON ALL 3 BUREAUS. Order your 3-bureau report from CreditReporting.com today. | |
| TaxBrain Online Tax Service | Prepare and E-File Online. Fast Refunds. TaxBrain.Com | |
| Loans.co.uk Partner Programme | Debt Worries? Consolidate your debts with a Secured Loan and benefit from affordable monthly payments. Click here | |
|
What is eFinancialDistrict Market Place?
eFinancialDistrict is a full-featured finance and accounting portal, and this book store is a part of it.
Since the book store selectively offers finance and accounting books and other related products,
our guess is that you are also interested in various finance and banking services.
This market place lists links to those services. Half of services offer you free information for you
to find out more about those services. Of course, it is completely free to request information.
If you find something interesting, just click on it! |
|
|
|
|
